Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court, Marin County. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the County Court, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the undertaking on appeal was not filed within five days after the service and filing of the notice of appeal, as required by Sec. 348 of the Practice Act. The notice of appeal was served and filed February 24th, 1863, and the undertaking was filed March 11th. The record shows, however, that a matter of justification of sureties, on the appeal bond, was heard before the County Judge, on the eleventh day of March, at which a new bond was presented, and approved by the Judge. It states, that “ both parties being pres^ ent, by them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cummins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knowles v. Crocker Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API