Legal Opinion

Bank of Fort Mill v. Rollins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1950No. 16398PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

217 S.C. 464 (1950)

61 S.E.2d 41

BANK OF FORT MILL

v.

ROLLINS.

16398

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 24, 1950.

Messrs. Hemphill & Hemphill, of Chester, for Appellant.

Messrs. John M. Spratt, of York, and McFadden & McFadden, of Chester, for Respondent.

The order of Judge Moss follows:

The Summons and Complaint in this action were served upon defendant on February 1st, 1949. Thereafter, defendant, through his attorneys, filed his Answer to the Complaint, service of which was accepted by attorneys for plaintiff, on February 21st, 1949. On the original Summons and Complaint is the notation, signed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Germofert Mfg. Co. v. CastlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Patterson v. Orangeburg Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  3. Bolton v. Wharton, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Burkhalter v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Bank of Johnston v. FrippSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. HiersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Rosemond v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. FIRST AMER. BANK OF VA. v. Litchfield Co. of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API