Geisler v. Geisler
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 36. — ACTION BY EMMA GEISLER AGAINST JOHN S. GEISLER TO RECOVER A PENDENTE LITE ALLOWANCE AS ALIMONY. Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court. Judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition. Divorce' — Alimony—Finality of Judgment — Action on Judgment.— A decree awarding to a wife certain weekly allowances as “alimony pendente lite until final order” was not a final judgment, on wkicfi an action could be maintained.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hobson
Affirming.
The common pleas court of Hamilton county, Ohio, on October 12, 1891, in the action of Emma Geisler v. John S. Geisler, entered the following decree for alimony pendente lite: “This cause came on to be heard this day upon the motion of the plaintiff for an allowance of alimony pendente lite and the evidence, and thereupon the court, with-the consent of the defendant, find that said motion is well taken and do grant the same. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that the said defendant pay to said plaintiff as such alimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Franck v. FranckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Gerrein's Admr. v. MichieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Horn v. Van HornWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920