Duckett v. Lipscomb
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
The. appeal is by the complainants below from a final decree wherein the trial court refused to reform the description in a deed.
Reformation was sought on the ground that the property described in .the deed in question “is not the property ■ intended to be conveyed by said deed, * *, * as a result of and through, the mutual mistake of all parties hereto.” The grantee in .the deed was the respondent in the trial court and is the appellee here.
' [1] One of the established grounds of equitable jurisdiction is the power to reform a written instrument so as to make it conform to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Darden v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Kant v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Bankhead v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Page v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Garrett v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. Substation ProductsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Pinson v. VeachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Original Church of God, Inc. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Hollis v. CameronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Williams v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.