Legal Opinion

Duckett v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1971No. 7 Div. 905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

The. appeal is by the complainants below from a final decree wherein the trial court refused to reform the description in a deed.

Reformation was sought on the ground that the property described in .the deed in question “is not the property ■ intended to be conveyed by said deed, * *, * as a result of and through, the mutual mistake of all parties hereto.” The grantee in .the deed was the respondent in the trial court and is the appellee here.

' [1] One of the established grounds of equitable jurisdiction is the power to reform a written instrument so as to make it conform to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Darden v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Kant v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Bankhead v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Page v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Garrett v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reliance Ins. Co. v. Substation ProductsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Pinson v. VeachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Original Church of God, Inc. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Hollis v. CameronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Williams v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API