Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Sliger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2016No. 5D14-3871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

In entering the amended final judgment in the underlying wrongful death action, the trial court determined that when the amount of the judgment is modified on appeal, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.340(c) requires post-trial interest to accrue from the date of the verdict, rather than from the date of the original judgment. For the reasons discussed below, we disagree and reverse.

On October 11, 2011, a jury rendered a verdict of $7,509,510 in the underlying medical malpractice action, finding Dr. James R. Shoemaker1 (“Appellant”) forty percent at fault for Stephen Sliger’s death.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Amerace Corp. v. StallingsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. St. Cloud Utilities v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Green v. RetySupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Hyundai Motor Co. v. FerayorniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. KalitanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Alexander v. KalitanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. EversDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. ROB ALEXANDER, M.D. v. SUSAN KALITANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API