Legal Opinion

In re Marlow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1907PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The petitioner is confined in the state reformatory under a sentence of the Camden Special Sessions upon a conviction for breaking and entering. He claims his freedom upon the ground that the sentence was invalid — first, because at the time it was imposed he was under the age of sixteen years, and second, because it is indeterminate, and therefore illegal. The -commitment under which he is held is merely a copy of the sentence of the court, and does not disclose his age. The statute authorizes the courts to sentence to the reformatory such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ex Parte BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Bradley v. Illinois State ReformatoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. George v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Mutart v. PrattUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API