Legal Opinion

IN RE RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 7, 2023No. 0:21-cv-01965Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Resideo Technologies, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-1965 (WMW/ECW) Derivative Litigation AMENDED1 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the proposed Settlement Class,2 seek final approval of settlement against Defendants Resideo Technologies, Inc. (Resideo); Michael G. Nefkens; Joseph D. Ragan, III; Niccolo de Masi; Paul Deninger; Roger Fradin; Jack Lazar; Nina Richardson; Andrew Teichl; and Sharon Weinbar. (Dkt. 42.) For the reasons addressed below, the Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API