Esco Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PARRIS, Circuit Judge:
PACTS
ESCO Corporation is subject to the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Act, Or.Rev. Stat. §§ 651.001-.990, which requires that employers ensure the payment of workers’ compensation claims, either through an independent insurance company or through self-insurance. On July 1, 1970, ESCO began self-insuring its workers’ compensation claims for amounts up to $50,000, with excess coverage provided by a commercial insurance company. Among other things, the Act required that ESCO establish and maintain a claims reserve to reflect the estimated future cost of benefits payable to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Kaiser Steel Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Wien Consolidated Airlines, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- ESCO Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Illinois Power Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Meagher v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.