Legal Opinion

Esco Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1985No. CA 84-3561PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRIS, Circuit Judge:

PACTS

ESCO Corporation is subject to the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Act, Or.Rev. Stat. §§ 651.001-.990, which requires that employers ensure the payment of workers’ compensation claims, either through an independent insurance company or through self-insurance. On July 1, 1970, ESCO began self-insuring its workers’ compensation claims for amounts up to $50,000, with excess coverage provided by a commercial insurance company. Among other things, the Act required that ESCO establish and maintain a claims reserve to reflect the estimated future cost of benefits payable to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Kaiser Steel Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Wien Consolidated Airlines, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. ESCO Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Illinois Power Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. Meagher v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API