Legal Opinion

Aykut Pilak v. Uber Technologies

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 27, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00456Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AYKUT PILAK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:25-CV-456-ZMB ) UBER TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Uber Technologies’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, Doc. 13, and self-represented Plaintiff Aykut Pilak’s motions for leave to file various documents, Docs. 20, 23, 30. Because Pilak entered into binding arbitration agreements with Uber, the Court grants Uber’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and denies the remaining motions as moot. BACKGROUND I. Factual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Southwest Airlines Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. Troy J. Lenz v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API