In Re Alameda County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 537-801-2-4 & 537-850-9
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORRICK, District Judge.
Petitioners, the owners of a 286-acre farm in Newark, California, seek to quash an administrative warrant obtained by applicants, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), on August 20, 1986, for the purpose of entering petitioners’ farm and determining what areas of the farm, if any, fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., commonly referred to as the “Clean Water Act” (“CWA”). For the reasons following, the motion to quash the warrant is denied.
I
The actual owners of the farm, and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. HollandDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
- United States v. WeismanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. John Pozsgai, Gizella Pozsgai, Mercer Wrecking & Recycling Corporation, J. Vinch & Sons, Inc. John Pozsgai and Gizella PozsgaiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Boliden Metech, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
- United States v. Sinclair Oil Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1990
- Ace Black Ranches, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
- PALMIERI VS. CLARK CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.