Legal Opinion

Nesmith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 2004No. A04A0569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

John Wiley Nesmith appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for discharge and acquittal pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-170. The trial court denied Nesmith’s motion on the ground that his demand for speedy trial was not timely filed. We agree and affirm.

The record shows that Nesmith was charged by accusation filed August 27, 2002, with the failure to wear a seat belt and two counts of DUI. On November 20, 2002, Nesmith waived arraignment and filed a demand for speedy trial pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-170. The case was originally set for trial on January 8, 2003, but was reset for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. MacInnis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. John Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API