Legal Opinion

Rizk v. Tucker Coal & Brick Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1978No. 56106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The appellant appeals the denial of his motion for new trial on the general grounds. A corporation has a duty to reveal its corporate status to the persons with whom it deals. See Patterson v. Duron Paints of Ga., 144 Ga. App. 123 (3) (240 SE2d 603) (1977). See generally Lamas v. Baldwin, 140 Ga. App. 37 (230 SE2d 13) (1976). The parties in this case agree that the appellant, Rizk, had procured goods for his partnership from the appellee, Tucker Coal & Brick Company, on open account. The issue argued on appeal is whether the appellant ever informed the appellee of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamas v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Patterson v. Duron Paints of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Minor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royal v. Davis Hauling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API