Legal Opinion

State v. Gerardo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 7, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, J.S.C.

(Temporarily Assigned On Recall)

The motion to be decided by this court is made by defendant Andrew Gerardo to suppress certain wiretap tapes on the grounds that they were improperly sealed as called for in N.JS.A. 2A:156A-14. Under Indictment No. SGJ173-86-l(l) defendant is charged along with others of violation of this State’s racketeering statute. The order permitting the wiretap in question was effective as of February 26, 1986. In accordance with N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-12(f), the order provided for not more than twenty days of interception.1 The prosecution and defense dispute…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Loboda v. Township of ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. State v. CerboSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API