Legal Opinion

Fraenznick v. Miller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1883No. CASE NO. 1; CASE NO. 2Published

Hearings of objections upon the judicial settlement of personal representatives’ accounts. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The above entitled cases have been coupled, and will be considered together, though they neither concern the same parties nor relate to the same estate.

Indeed, the two proceedings differ somewhat from each other, in respect to the nature of the issue submitted for the determination of the court. Each involves, however, an important question as to the jurisdiction of the Surrogate, and as to the construction of a provision of the Code from which that jurisdiction, if it exists at all, is solely derivable. Brief statements of the facts of these cases will disclose the nature of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bevan v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Riggs v. . CraggNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Glacius v. . FogelNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API