Legal Opinion

Quintanta v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered June 10, 2002, which granted defendants-appellants’ motion for renewal or reargument and thereupon adhered to the prior order (same court and Justice), entered February 26, 2002, which, inter alia, denied appellants’ cross motion to compel document disclosure and for summary judgment on their cross claim for contractual indemnification, and granted the municipal defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendants-appellants’ claims for common-law indemnification and contribution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Penn Palace Operating, Inc. v. Two Penn Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API