Legal Opinion
Stinnett v. Gulf, C. S. F. Ry.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 26, 1931No. 9519PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This general statement of the nature and result of the suit, deemed to be reasonably accurate in all material features as such, is taken from appellant’s brief, after revision of the verbiage in a few unimportant particulars:
“Mrs. M. C. Stinnett, a widow, brought this suit against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company for damages resulting to her by reason of the death of her adult son, Bob Stinnett, alleging that his death was caused by Bob Stinnett’s being struck by one of defendant’s engines and trains, on or near the track of the defendant, at a public crossing constituted by an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- Brown v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by15 opinions
- Surkey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Higgins v. Standard LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Kleising v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Vontsteen v. RollishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- International-Great Northern R. v. PenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.