Legal Opinion

Kruger v. Vernon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1925No. Docket No. 3991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure a promissory note for the principal sum of $150. The appeal is by the defendants George T. and Zoe Vernon. The action was begun by Lillian M.. Mann, who departed this life subsequently to the appeal but prior to the submission of the case here. The administratrix of her estate has been substituted in this court. Because it will conduce to brevity, we shall refer to the decedent, throughout this opinion, either as the “plaintiff” or as the “respondent,” notwithstanding her death and the substitution of her personal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Rice v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Rodgers v. PeckhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Nourse v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Campbell v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. K. & M. Inc. v. LeCuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API