Legal Opinion
In re Cope
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 2, 1935No. Nos. 8068, 8074PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
It was thought that the memorandum of the court (8 F. Supp. 778) was not clear on certain questions discussed, so the matter has been reargued, supplemental briefs submitted and considered by the court; It is urged that a debt must exist between the bankrupt and the creditor; and that the bankrupt is precluded from litigation regarding possession' of the property.
Subsection (e) of section 75 of the act (11 USCA § 203 (e) provides that the farmer may file a petition “stating that the farmer is insolvent or unable to meet his debts as they mature, and that it is desirable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Plains Loan, Realty & Investment Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- In Re CopeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1934
- Lane v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradford v. FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- In re ChrismanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- In re CornellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935