Legal Opinion
Labarbera v. HUBBARD EQUIPMENT CORP.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 15, 2003No. CV 01-4039(ADS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPATT, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the plaintiffs’ application for attorneys’ fees and costs.
On June 13, 2001, the plaintiffs, who are the trustees of the Local 282 benefit funds, commenced this action against Hubbard Equipment Corp. and J.E.T. Resources, Inc. (“JET”) (collectively, the “defendants”) to compel JET to post a surety bond or its equivalent pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement (“agreement”). According to the plaintiffs, JET previously posted bonds for the union, and in May of 2000, a bond expired and was never renewed, in violation of the agreement.
On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Alco Express Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Greenblatt v. Delta Plumbing & Heating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Labarbera v. Clestra Hauserman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Gary Labarbera v. Clestra Hauserman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004