Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 7, 1951No. 21773_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The respondent, E. A. Laboratories, Inc. (E. A. L.), was at all times here pertinent engaged primarily in the production of articles for the War and Navy Departments. In November 1943 it had entered into a labor contract signed by both the International Union (International) and Local 844 (Local), United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO, which contained a no strike clause. However, relations betwen the Local and E. A. L. were antagonistic from the beginning. On August 5, 1944, the three top officers of the Local were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. PrettymanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Hamilton v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by25 opinions
- W. C. Nabors, D/B/A W. C. Nabors Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Marshall Car Wheel and Foundry Co. Of Marshall, Texas, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. WallickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, Intervenor. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.