Legal Opinion

Reissner v. Anness

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[This was a bill in equity by Christoph Eeissner and others against S. W. Anness and others.]

1Opinion of the Court

NIXON, District Judge.

The bill of complaint is filed against the defendants for in-' fringement of certain letters patent, No. 7,-751, reissued to John A. Frey, June 19th, 1877, for improvements in coal-oil stoves, to which the defendants have put in a plea embracing three distinct defences, and which are, in effect, three several pleas, substantially as follows:

(.1.) That the reissue to Fray was unlawful, because he had previously obtained a patent in Canada for the same invention, granted Hay 15th, 1873, for the term of five years, and the reissue here was not limited to expire at the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saltus v. Tobias & SeamanNew York Court of Chancery · 1823

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller & Lux v. RickeyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API