Legal Opinion

Great West Casualty Co. v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1982No. 815DC578PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Under full faith and credit, our courts are bound by the Tennessee judgment finding plaintiff and defendant jointly and severally liable. U.S. Const. art. IV, § 1. Moreover, as a general rule, the right of one tort-feasor to obtain contribution from another tort-feasor is a substantive right and hence is governed by the law of the place of the tort. See 18 Am. Jur. 2d Contribution § 44 (1965). The choice of law rule of North Carolina adheres to this general principle. See Tatham v. Hoke, 469 F. Supp. 914 (W.D.N.C. 1979). Thus the law of Tennessee governs the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BIBLE AND GODWIN CONST. CO., INC v. Faener CorpTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tatham v. HokeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1979
  3. Watts v. Memphis Transit Management Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Herron v. FletcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zeller v. CantuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Paradise Valley Hospital v. SchlossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Geiger v. Guilford College Community Volunteer Firemen's Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  4. Gaffney Stilwell v. GustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Zeller v. CantuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API