United States v. Barahona-Mejia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Barahona-Mejia appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to a charge of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm in part and remand for the limited purpose of consideration by the district court of whether it will impose a different sentence under the now-advisory sentencing guidelines and resentencing as necessary.
First, Barahona-Mejia argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersy, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Rodriguez-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005