Legal Opinion

United States v. Barahona-Mejia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2006No. 04-51361Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Barahona-Mejia appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to a charge of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm in part and remand for the limited purpose of consideration by the district court of whether it will impose a different sentence under the now-advisory sentencing guidelines and resentencing as necessary.

First, Barahona-Mejia argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersy, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Rodriguez-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API