Legal Opinion
Silvestre v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 21, 1997No. Civil Action 95-1399PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This ease is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants the Bell Atlantic Corporation (“BAC”), Bell Atlantic-New Jersey (“BA-NJ”), Michael Losch, Bill Williams, and Raymond Smith. Plaintiff Manuel Silvestre has opposed summary judgment. The Court has considered the motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons stated herein, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted on all counts.
Silvestre alleges several causes of action against the defendants. In his first and second counts, Silvestre alleges…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Emerson Radio Corp. v. Orion Sales, Inc. Otake Trading Co. Ltd. Technos Development Limited Shigemasa Otake John Richard BondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Mandel v. UBS/PaineWebber, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- RICHARD A. PULASKI CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Air Frame Hangars, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Mardini v. Viking Freight, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Swider v. Ha-Lo Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.