Legal Opinion

Beaudoin v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 14, 1987No. A4-85-81PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Judgment On Jury Verdict

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

A collision of legal principles renders a truly equitable result in this case impossible. The difficult decision confronting this court is which inequitable result is most proper.

Mark Beaudoin, the plaintiff, was an employee of Wood Wireline. Texaco, Inc., the defendant, hired Wireline to conduct a pressure gradient check on Texaco’s well, CM Loomer # 13 near Keene, North Dakota.

Beaudoin and a co-worker arrived on the unlighted site before dawn on February 21, 1983, to prepare their equipment for the job. Beaudoin was uncoiling…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Reiter v. DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bartels v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hebron Public School District No. 13 v. U.S. GypsumDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1988
  2. Jung v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API