Legal Opinion

People v. Kahn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 12, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is insisted that the indictment is unintelligible. The indictment is based on Cahill’s Illinois Statutes, ch. 38, ¶ 116 which provides: “If any two or more persons conspire or agree together, . . . or to commit any felony, they shall be deemed guilty of a conspiracy,” etc. The words “wrongfully and wickedly” found in that portion of the statute omitted from the above quotation have no application to a conspiracy to commit felony. The indictment consists of two counts and there was a general verdict of guilty. If there is one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lowell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. The People v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. QuesseIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. BondIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BurlesonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. WalterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API