Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Steadman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1944No. Appeals, 72 and 73PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant was convicted on two indictments charging statutory rape and bastardy. He admitted the rape but denied the paternity of the two children. On appeal, his only complaint is that he was not permitted to prove the contents of a letter allegedly written by the girl on or about May 21, 1943, after the birth of the children, exonerating him from the charge of bastardy.

The girl, Geneva Kiley, is the niece of appellant’s wife, and lived in appellant’s home for approximately a year before the birth of her first child. This child was born when she was fourteen and a half…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Hemphill v. McClimansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  3. Gorgas v. HertzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Coxe v. EnglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Muncey v. Pullman Taxi Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RawlsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Pfautz v. Sterling InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API