Crouse v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PACK, R. WALLACE, Associate Judge.
Appellant challenges his sentence for sexual battery, which represents a departure from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse.
Although the trial court provided written reasons for departure, it failed to state those reasons at the sentencing hearing. This court has recently held that this practice violates a defendant’s due process rights. Washington v. State, 501 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). In this case, however, at the sentencing hearing, the state presented reasons for departure and appellant’s counsel argued against those reasons. The trial judge did…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Lerma v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Casteel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Griffis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Felts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Hawkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988