Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Majik Market
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1981Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROCK, Justice.
This appeal presents the single issue:
“Whether the maximum amount of worker’s compensation benefits properly payable to the plaintiff, as a widower with no dependent children, for the death of his wife, the employee, is determined by Subsection (e)(1) or by Subsection (eX12) of T.C.A., § 50-1013?”
The trial judge held that an ambiguity existed in the statute and awarded compensation under Subsection (e)(12), being 66⅜% of the decedent’s average weekly wage.
Subsection (e)(1) of T.C.A., § 50 — 1013, provides as follows:
“In death cases, compensation payable to dependents…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marsh v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Marcum v. HickleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921