Cooper v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant John Cooper correctly argues that the trial court failed to make the requisite factual findings regarding his predicate convictions not having been set aside or pardoned as required under section 775.-084(l)(a)3. and 4. This is a prerequisite for sentencing a defendant as an habitual offender. We therefore reverse and remand on the authority of Van Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Banes v. State, 597 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Simon v. State, 589 So.2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Rolle v. State, 586 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); King v. State, 580 So.2d 169…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Van Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Banes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992