Legal Opinion

Comsult LLC v. Girdwood Mining Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2017No. 7182 S-16113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Girdwood Mining Company transferred stock and mineral royalty interests to Com-sult LLC pursuant to a contract between the parties. Girdwood Mining later refused to perform its obligations with respect to the stock and royalty interests, arguing that the contract transferring the stock and royalty interests was illegal. The superior court ruled that because the contract was illegal, it would not grant relief to either party. Comsult appeals seeking enforcement of its stock and royalty interests. We hold that Comsult’s stock and royalty interests…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Arcidi v. National Ass'n of Government Employees, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lance Pruitt v. State of Alaska, Office of Lt. Governor Kevin Meyer, Division of Elections, Director Gail Fenumiai, and Elizabeth A. Hodges SnyderAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Nageak v. MallottAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Nageak v. MallottAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Sean Rene Michael BurdetteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API