Legal Opinion

Zetterower v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1952No. 33980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Although denied by the defendant, the jury was authorized to find that he admitted the possession of the whisky. Bulloch County being dry—of which fact this court takes judicial notice (see Leonard v. State, 204 Ga. 465 (4a), 50 S. E. 2d, 212)—-the quantity of whisky was in violation of law. In Brown v. State, 74 Ga. App. 880 (3, 4, 5) (41 S. E. 2d, 912), it was held: “Where the defendant admitted that the whisky belonged to him without saying anything more, this raised a legal presumption that he knowingly possessed, had or controlled it. This presumption…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Leonard v. State Ex Rel. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Hogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API