Creeks v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAGARDE, Justice.
Appellant Richard Lynn Creeks appeals from a judgment nunc pro tunc that added a recitation of a deadly weapon finding to a judgment rendered two years earlier by which Creeks was convicted of murder and sentenced to seventy-five years’ confinement. Creeks raises two points on appeal asserting that the trial court erred in: (1) conducting the hearing on the State’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc without his being present; and (2) entering its judgment nunc pro tunc. We overrule both of Creeks’s points and, accordingly, affirm the judgment nunc pro tunc of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte PoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Dees v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Asberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Gomez, CesarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Jose Guadalupe Carmona v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.