Legal Opinion

Giamelli v. Rahtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

The claimant was injured June 9, 1922. Because he failed to file a claim for compensation within one year thereafter his claim is barred under the provisions of section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law unless because of reasons assigned by the State Industrial Board.

The Board finds that a letter written by the claimant to the *721State Department of Labor on February 9, 1923, constituted a claim within the meaning of the statute. The letter is as follows:

“ February 9, 1923.
“ Gentlemen.— I was employed by J. Rahtz, 303 E. Houston St. and fell from the first story while hanging…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Beagle v. GroffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. HoageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  2. Claim of Lombardo v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API