Legal Opinion

Spano v. Tawfik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), entered February 23, 1999, which denied their motion to disqualify the firm of Hughes Hubbard & Reed, L. L. P., from representing the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants moved to disqualify the plaintiffs’ counsel, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, L. L. P. (hereinafter H H & R) on the ground that it previously represented the defendant Samer Tawfik. Generally, an attorney will be disqualified where the party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forest Park Associates Ltd. Partnership v. KrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Wyser-PratteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Juergens v. SchanmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Kuberzig v. Advanced Dermatology, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nesenoff v. Dinerstein & Lesser, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Glashow v. Linden Towers Cooperative 4, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API