Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 9, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. N. W. Maoy, Judge. Indictment for larceny. Yerdict of. guilty, and a judgment, from which the defendant appealed.—

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

*521 *51I. The larceny charged was of eight hogs, on the twenty-fifth day of March, 1894. A great number of objections are presented or suggested as to the admission and exclusion of evidence. The objections are based on appellant’s abstract. An amendment to the abstract by the state, which is *52sustained by tbe transcript, and is to be taken as true, shows that the objections are largely based on misapprehensions of the record and the facts disclosed thereby. Most of the questions as to the evidence are, in no sense, argued, but, as we have said, only suggested; and, in view of the record, we may…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Germinder v. Machinery Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API