Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Stapleton v. Bell

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This motion is brought on by an order of Mr. Justice May-ham, requiring the defendants to show cause at this special term why a writ of mandamus should not issue to compel them to sign the last election returns from the Ninth ward of the city of Troy. The relators and the defendants are the four duly-appointed inspectors of election for said ward, and acted as such at the general election, held on the 5th day of November last. The law regulating the canvass and estimates of votes by inspectors requires that “as soon as the poll of an election shall have been finally closed, the inspectors of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Fleming v. HartNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Stapleton v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API