Legal Opinion

Romano v. Curry Auto Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated March 18, 2002, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In the instant case, the plaintiff John Romano’s injury was covered by workers’ compensation, and he received workers’ compensation benefits from the insurance carrier for his employer, Mohansic Corp. (hereinafter Mohansic). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kudelski v. 450 Lexington VentureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Dittert v. Oak Tree Farm Dairy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Srigley v. Universal Builders SupplyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. PepeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Sanna v. Rim, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. George v. IBC Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API