Legal Opinion

Auditore v. Cantanzaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to vacate an order of arrest.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

Motion on notice to vacate an order of arrest. The order was obtained before the Civil Practice Act took effect. The motion to vacate also preceded the taking effect of that act. Upon the argument plaintiff presented additional affidavits and asked their consideration in support of the order, to which objection was interposed by the defendant under the claim that the noticing of the motion constituted a “ right accrued or acquired ” within the provisions of section 1573 of the Civil Practice Act, which “ right ” the said section declares shall not be affected or impaired by the act. Analogous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sulzbacher v. J. Cawthra & Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heitzmann v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  2. Republic of Italy v. De AngelisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Hernandez v. Brookdale Mills, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API