Legal Opinion

Randall v. READING COMPANY

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1972No. Civ. 69-513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

This opinion sets forth the reasons for the Order of this Court denying defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative for a new trial.

This action against the Reading Company, arising out of the death of Harry C. Randall, a railroad employee, was brought by Randall’s widow, pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. 1 The jury found that negligence of the railroad in failing to furnish prompt emergency medical attention contributed to Randall’s death from a heart attack and awarded plaintiff $60,000.

I. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT N.O.V.

Defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jim Buell v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Bridgeman v. Terminal RR Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Handy v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Welby v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API