Legal Opinion

Riedinger v. Diamond Match Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1903No. 1,168Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

This’ was an action, on an implied contract, to recover damages for the failure of the defendant below to run, sort, and deliver, with reasonable dispatch and care, certain logs driven by the plaintiff below down the Ontonagon river, in Michigan, whereby they became worm-eaten, sap-rotten, and discolored. The case is brought here to review the action of the trial judge directing the jury to return a verdict for thé defendant on the ground that the same damages claimed in this action were sought to be recovered in a former suit between the same parties, in which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nester v. Diamond Match Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API