S.K. v. State

S.K. and S.K., parents of R.K., appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to set aside a “PAY agreement”1 entered into between the State and the juvenile offender who was charged with committing a lewd and lascivious molestation on R.K, and their motion to extend the terms of the protective order entered against the juvenile offender. Concluding that R.K’s parents lack standing to seek to set aside the PAY agreement or to modify the terms of the juvenile offender’s release, we affirm.

A probable cause affidavit was filed by the State indicating that N.S., a minor, committed a lewd…