Legal Opinion

Steubenville, East Liverpool & Beaver Valley Traction Co. v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1928No. 6084Published

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is an action in assumpsit brought by Tbe Steubenville, East Liverpool & Beaver Valley Traction Company, against Tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company, in the circuit court of Hancock county to recover the sum of $657.88, being one-half the expense of the maintenance of the intersections of plaintiff’s and defendant’s tracks at 9th and 11th Streets in the City of Chester. The court, sitting as a jury, found for the defendant. Plaintiff prosecutes error from a judgment entered on said finding.

On the 4th day of August, 1900, the East Liverpool & Rock…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Wellsburg & State Line Railroad v. Pan Handle Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lanahan v. HeaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. Rutherford v. RutherfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. County Court v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API