Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Subel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-1431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted our writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether Subel's rights were violated when he was denied his "good time" status for violation of rules regulating the Supervised Intensive Restitution ("SIR") program.

However, while this case was pending here, Subel escaped. He thereby abandoned his appeal and his petition for certiorari.Jett v. State, 46 Ala. App. 290, 241 So.2d 131 (1970), and Hallv. Alabama, 700 F.2d 1333 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied,464 U.S. 859, 104 S.Ct. 183, 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).

The fact that Subel was subsequently recaptured does not alter the fact that his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carl Hall v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Jett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. BillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Subel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Bargo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API