Legal Opinion

Eastman, Gardner & Co. v. Sullivan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923No. 23114Published

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

The appellee in the circuit court sued appellant for damages for failing to erect and maintain proper stock gaps and cattle guards upon inclosed lands of plaintiff (appellee). The declaration is in two counts, the first count is for two hundred fifty dollars statutory penalty, and the second count is for tAventy-five dollars, the actual damages sustained by plaintiff.

The agreed statement of facts shows that the railroad of the appellant is a logging road and not a railroad operated as a common carrier in any sense of the term; further that twenty-five dollars is the amount of actual damages…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Deemer Mfg. Co. v. KilpatrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API