Stone v. Atwood
Illinois Supreme Court
Iu May, 1859, Stone and Atwood having certain matters in dispute, submitted them to their respective attorneys, Sherman and Fuller, as arbitrators, for determination. Atwood owned a large amount of furniture in the “ Orient House,” on which, or a part thereof, Stone held a chattel mortgage.
Read the full summary
Iu May, 1859, Stone and Atwood having certain matters in dispute, submitted them to their respective attorneys, Sherman and Fuller, as arbitrators, for determination. Atwood owned a large amount of furniture in the “ Orient House,” on which, or a part thereof, Stone held a chattel mortgage. There was another chattel mortgage on all the furniture, given to B. M. Hough, M. Chapin, and defendant Covert, to secure $1,000, advanced by them to Atwood, and also to secure them from liability on a bond they had signed for Atwood. The arbitrators were to fix a valuation on the furniture, and were…
1Opinion of the CourtBkeese, J.
The bill was filed in this case, by the appellant, to correct a mistake in the award after the same had been in 'most particulars executed by the parties. The record shows a submission in writing, under bonds, by the appellant and Atwood, of certain matters in difference between them, growing out of the lease of the “ Orient House” in Chicago, owned by appellant, and occupied by Atwood, and money loaned by appellant to Atwood, and out of which had arisen divers suits at law. By the terms of the submission the arbitrators were required to find first, the balance due from Atwood to appellant…
2Cited by11 opinions
- City of Eau Claire v. Eau Claire Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Beach v. SuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
- Pulliam v. PensoneauIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Story v. DeArmondIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Eisenmeyer v. SauterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.