Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Redmond

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1990No. 3296, 3297Published

1DissentKelly, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree that the September 30, 1988 disclosure order was interlocutory, and immediately appealable only by permissive appeal. I further agree with the majority’s conclusion that the October 25, 1988 discovery sanctions order is appealable, as well as with the majority’s statement that, "in determining the propriety of the lower court’s order of October 25,1988, we find that the merits of the September 30,1988 order inescapably requires our review.” Majority opinion, supra, at 555. However, unlike the majority, I find that the disclosure order was improper. Moreover, I…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API