Legal Opinion

Parker v. Hasem Grocery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Earl Owens and Marlene Owens appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated February 27, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the case to the trial calendar and for leave to file a late note of issue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*508An action dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 may be restored if the plaintiff can demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for a default and a meritorious cause of action (see Bokhari v Home Depot U.S.A., 4 AD3d 381, 382 [2004]; cf. Fraga v…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bokhari v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Simmons v. McSimmons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Reyes v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Hansel v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Fraga v. Smithaven Open MRIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petersen v. Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API