Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Carr

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 30, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rubenstein, S.

The objectants’ motion to vacate or modify certain items of the demand for a bill of particulars is disposed of as follows:

Item 1 (a) is modified. In lieu of the information demanded, the objectants will be directed to give the date of commencement of the services and the date on which they ended and the time devoted thereto within such period of time.

Items 1 (c) and 5 (c) are modified to the extent that the objectants will be required to furnish a fair description of each of the documents prepared by them, the dates thereof and whether one or more than one of them relates to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Smidt v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Mertz v. de LandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency, Ltd. v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API