Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 1990No. 88-2990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Of the three issues raised by appellants, only their challenge to the judge of compensation claim’s denial of a penalty, sought pursuant to the provisions of Section 440.20(8), Florida Statutes (1985), is meritorious. Despite the issuance of this court’s mandate on July 29, 1988, following an earlier appeal from an order awarding death benefits, the employer/carrier failed to pay the sums owed until September 28, *9631988, more than 30 days after our opinion had become final, contrary to section 440.-20(8). Accordingly, appellants are entitled to be awarded a 20 percent penalty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cling Electric, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Binimelis ex rel. Binimelis v. M.E.F. International Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steinbrecher v. BETTER CONST. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Sigg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. City of North Miami v. MarcyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API